Umar Khalid is back from his brief hiding and it is a right decision. One can understand in his situation it is a courageous decision, and therefore, shows his determination and courage as well. May be some faith in the processes of the Indian system and certainly confidence in the support of his ideological comrades.
The speech he gave at JNU (saw this morning) is an inspiring speech and shows his concern for the deprived masses and struggle for them or on their behalf. The speech also shows concern for what the society might become if jingoist nationalism and canard spread through media gets upper hand. It also shows a confidence bordering on arrogance, but that perhaps is a necessary ingredient in any movement. Every Indian should be with Umar Khalid in these things.
But he answered none of the questions which right thinking, in my view—right thinking, Indians would like to ask him. Some of the questions I have for this staunch supporter of the deprived people are listed below.
- Let me begun with the one which arises out of today’s speech. He counted several instances when JNU students did not allow a view counter to their own ideology to be expressed in JNU. He clearly thinks that it was right. Then on what grounds can he demand right to free speech? Is it defendable to demand right to free speech for people who share views with him but feeling proud of denying the same right to others?
- He clearly raised at the least one objectionable, to my mind, slogans: Kashmir ki azadi tak jang rahegi. Does he support violent so-called azadi movement in Kashmir? If he does, why should he not be considered abetting violence against the Indian state and Indian people? If he does not, what does that slogan mean?
- He shouted “kitane Afzal maroge, ….”. Let’s assume he was unhappy with the lacunas pointed out by many in Afzal’s trial and that he happens to believe that Afzal was hanged wrongly. But no one denies Afzal’s involvement in the parliament attack. What are his views on the parliament attack? Was it a just attack, and does he support it?
- He was the most prominent organizer of the event on 9th February 2016. There were slogans like “Bharat tere tukade honge, …”, “Bharat ki barbadi tak, …..” in that event. What is his attitude to these slogans? Will he help catch the people who raised those slogans? Does he feel responsible about such slogans raised in an event he organized?
- The permission was withdrawn before it started. He simply ignored the authorities. Does he believe that if the authorities do not go as you want you have the right to disregard their decisions?
- There was an encounter between the terrorists and security forces in Kashmir a couple of days back. Several (seven?) security people and civilians dies in that. What is his stand on them? What does he think about the security forces people who died? Does he have any thoughts to spare for them as he has great concern for Afzal?
And do supporters of Umar Khalid know his stand on these issues? Are they with him on these issues, whatever his views on them might be?
If the supporters of JNU resistance and Umar Khalid be kind enough to explain their position on these issues, they may find many more supporters among the Indian people. But may be they do not need or care for support of people who ask such clearly retrograde questions!
Rohit , I am surprised that you have glossed some facts – point no. 1. Umar did say that Indira Gandhi was stopped after emergency but for the others he said that there were protests against them, they were not stopped – he was talking about the right to protest. 2. He did not shout Kashmir ki azadi tak jang rahegi. What is the problem in saying kitne Afzal maroge har ghar she Afzal nikalega. It is clear that the whole case was weak and justice was not done – the judgement itself said that there was no incontrovertible proof that he was involved – even Chidambaram said there is nothing wrong in those outside government questioning the judgement as hanging was given as a punishment to assuage the collective consciousness. so if there is a slogan with the purpose that if injustice is done more and more people will rise against it, what is wrong with it? 3. It is now clear that the Bharat ki Barbadi slogans were morphed onto the original videos. Your point number 6. Is quite similar to the Sangh propaganda – I think we all need to study Kashmir and its history more. Post the 90s killing of Kashmiri Muslims by armed forces have surpassed the killing of Kashmiri pandit a before that and certainly Kashmiri civilians are killed much more than army personnel. There is rape and plunder by armed forces too in Kashmir as well as north east. It is not the jawans fault – this whole bogey of border nationalism, hyped up and used for power politics is the problem – the azadi slogans are all for azadi for women, against casteism , from poverty etc.
All these students have sworn by the constitution – Jai Kisan, Jai jawan, Jai samvidhan are their slogans.
Anjali, response to your comments became too long, so please see it here https://rohitdhankar.com/2016/03/27/jnu-issue-again-a-response-to-a-friend/